Saturday, May 30, 2009

Obama administration asks Supreme Court not to grant cert in Cartoon Networks v. CSC Holdings case

According to this report in TechDirt, the Obama Administration's Solicitor General has submitted a brief arguing that the Supreme Court ought not to disturb the holding of the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in Cartoon Networks v. CSC Holdings.

The Cartoon Networks case holds that the cable companies' online storage for its customers did not invoke the reproduction right in the Copyright Act since the files were "transitory", having been buffered for only 1.2 seconds.

The Government's brief argued, among other things, that the peculiar procedural posture of the case militated against Supreme Court review, since the plaintiffs had waived their contributory liability line of attack, and the defendant had waived its fair use defense.

Amicus Curiae Brief of United States

Previous articles about Cartoon Networks case:

"MPAA loses in case against Cablevision, Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings"
"Editorial comment on Cartoon Network v. CSC and Capitol v. Thomas"
"My article in "Journal of Internet Law""

[Ed. note. As I pointed out in footnote 18 of my "Journal of Internet Law" article, the content cartel's "usual suspects", including the same Jenner & Block attorneys who now occupy some of the highest positions in the Justice Department, were representing the film companies in the Cartoon Networks case. So the filing of this brief shows that there is more than one voice being heard. Which is good. -R.B.]

Commentary & discussion:

TechDirt
Los Angeles Times
Slashdot
p2pnet.net



Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Friday, May 29, 2009

Court defers ruling on constitutionality of statutory damages in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Cloud, denies defendant's motion to dismiss

In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Cloud, a Philadelphia case, the Court deferred ruling on the constitutionality question, under the doctrine of "constitutional avoidance", and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

May 29, 2009, Decision Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Declining to Rule on Constitutionality of RIAA's Statutory Damages Theory




Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Court sets July 20th trial date in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum

In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, the Court has set a July 20th trial date.

The order states that the schedule is contingent upon: (1) the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims being granted, thus eliminating the need for additional discovery, and (2) denial, or deferral until after trial, of the defendant's constitutional challenge until after trial.

The order fixes the close of discovery as May 30th (this coming Saturday) and leaves June 5th at 2:30 PM as the scheduled date and time for the argument of the various non-discovery motions.

May 28, 2009, Scheduling Order

[Ed. note. It is unclear to me how the May 30th discovery date interrelates with (a) the hard drive inspection, and (b) the discovery that would be needed into plaintiffs' revenues and expenses, to ascertain their actual damages in connection with the constitutional challenge. -R.B.]



Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

EFF launches "Teach Copyright Right", a program trying to combat RIAA's propaganda campaign directed at school children

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is planning a campaign of its own to counter a misleading propaganda campaign launched by the RIAA to spread its false views of copyright law to school children. The EFF program is named "Teach Copyright Right".

Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

RIAA better watch out: Judge Sotomayor knows about internet, computers, and copyright law

Commentary:

According to this report in Gizmodo, Judge Sotomayor is a "nerd" and is very knowledgeable about computers, the internet, and copyright law.

For obvious reasons, that is not the kind of judge the RIAA lawyers like to find on the bench.



Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Appeal brief attacks RIAA litigation process in Arista Records v. Does 1-16

The appellant's brief filed yesterday in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Arista Records v. Does 1-16, a case targeting 16 students at the State University of New York in Albany, attacks the RIAA litigation process.

The brief starts out:

This is one of an estimated 30,000 cases brought since 2003 in federal district courts around the nation by members of the Recording Industry Association of America (“RIAA”), alleging copyright infringement by the downloading and filesharing of recorded music over the internet. Although the cases are always brought in the names of record company plaintiffs who allege that they are the owners or proprietors of the copyrights involved, it is undisputed that the RIAA is the real party in interest, and that it controls and determines the course and strategy of the litigation, and references to the RIAA herein should be understood in this light.

This flood of litigation has been brought supposedly to stem the detrimental effect on sales of compact disks caused by the availability of recorded music on the internet, although the extent of that effect has been vigorously disputed by disinterested scholars, see infra at 7 n. 3. This appeal appears to raise issues of first impression in the Second Circuit arising from this campaign.

The RIAA’s theory in these cases is that anyone who downloads song files from the internet and makes them available to anyone by way of so-called peer-to-peer software (which enables users to exchange files directly between their computers without intermediate servers) has violated both the copyright owner’s right to make copies, contained in 17 U.S.C. § 106(1), and the distribution right of § 106(3). Its position, moreover, is that the distribution right is violated whether or not any copies have actually been distributed, and that merely making song files available to others is an infringement of that right.

However, the right to make a personal copy of copyrighted material may be protected as fair use, 17 U.S.C. § 107; Sony Corp. of America, Inc. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984). Moreover, as will be shown, infringement of the distribution right requires the actual distribution of copies, and merely making copies available without more does not violate the distribution right. In other words, the attempted distribution of copyrighted material–which is all that plaintiffs-appellees allege–is not infringement and is not actionable.

This nationwide litigation campaign has been seriously detrimental to the fair administration of justice and the public policy importance of establishing clear boundaries to copyright law, and has imposed enormous burdens on the federal courts. The RIAA has used questionable investigations, unsupported and erroneous legal theories, ex parte applications and communications with court personnel, violations of the rules against joinder of unrelated defendants, and
abusive litigation tactics against individuals, many of whom are completely innocent, and none of whom should reasonably expect to find themselves forced to defend their personal use of computers in federal courts.

District Judges and commentators have often criticized the RIAA’s tactics and the legal theories behind them , but the litigation continues, with seemingly little effect on the public’s unflagging desire and intention to download music from the internet.


And it argues, among other things, that

-there is a qualified First Amendment privilege of anonymity;
-the plaintiff has an obligation to put in a prima facie case;
-the RIAA's complaint fails to meet pleading standards;
-the RIAA's technology and methodology are too flawed and unreliable to be relied upon by the courts;
-the RIAA's inability to identify proper defendants is not a basis for the courts to bend the rules to assist the RIAA; and
-the defendant should be awarded a reasonable attorneys fee.

The RIAA's subpoena, and all lower court proceedings, have been stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

The RIAA's responsive brief is due June 25th; appellant's reply brief is due July 6th; argument will be August 10th or later.

Brief of Appellant


Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Monday, May 25, 2009

MediaSentry operating in Australia

According to this report in p2pnet.net, MediaSentry is operating now in Australia.

[Ed. note. Let's hope the members of the Australian bar are ready for it. Wouldn't want the Australian people to be victimized like so many American families have been. -R.B.]



Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Sunday, May 24, 2009

MPAA says making a personal backup copy of DVD is copyright infringement

According to this article in C/Net News, the MPAA has taken the position that making a personal backup copy of a DVD is a copyright infringement.



Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Friday, May 22, 2009

Pro se defendant files amended answer in Georgia case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Simms

In a pro se Georgia case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Simms, the defendant has filed an amended answer.

Order granting defendant's motion for leave to file amended answer
Amended answer



Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

In Capitol Records v. Thomas,Hearing Set for June 10,Trial Set for June 15,Caption amended to reflect Ms. Thomas's new married name

In Capitol Records v. Thomas, the Court entered orders indicating that there are pretrial motions scheduled for June 10th, the trial continues to be scheduled to begin June 15th, and the caption is amended to reflect Ms. Thomas's new married name, Jammie Thomas-Rasset.

The scheduling order provides that the defendant herself is required to appear at the June 10th hearing. There is no similar provision requiring the plaintiffs to appear at that hearing.

Scheduling order
Order permitting change of defendant's name in caption

Commentary & discussion:

Copyrights & Campaigns




Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Motion for substitution granted in Capitol Records v. Thomas

The motion for substitution of attorneys in Capitol Records v. Thomas has been granted.

The Court also issued an amended Trial Notice, which retains the June 15th trial date.

The withdrawing attorneys issued the following press release:

A few hours ago Chief United States Court District Judge granted Brian Toder’s motion to withdraw as defendant’s counsel and to substitute in his stead K.A.D. Camara of Camara & Sibley of Houston, Texas with local counsel Garrett Blanchfield of Reinhardt, Wendorf & Blanchfield of St. Paul, Minnesota. The trial date of June 15th in Duluth, Minnesota remains unchanged.

I have met with my partners and am pleased to announce that our firm will never seek any additional payment from Jammie Thomas for the considerable work we have done in her case. If we are to receive any funds from this case, it will be solely from plaintiffs if Ms. Thomas-Rasset ultimately becomes the prevailing party which we believe is highly possible given the caliber of the counsel and amici on her side.

I would like to thank Ray Beckerman, personally, for the help he gave us in acquiring local counsel, the help he has and continues to give others, but mainly for his tireless and noble efforts championing the cause against the destructive course of action taken by the RIAA.

Finally, I hope we are remembered not for withdrawing, but for the considerable time and expense we provided before we could no longer afford to stay in Jammie’s fight. Her interests are now well served, and we wish her well.

Brian N. Toder
Order granting motion to substitute attorneys
Amended notice of trial


Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net
Digital Media Wire





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Judge orders RIAA to disclose "methods employed" by expert & "instruction or guidance" given by lawyers

Commentary:


One of the key elements in yesterday's protective order in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, was Judge Gertner's direction that

the Examining Expert shall be required to disclose both the methods employed to inspect the hard drive and any instruction or guidance received from the Plaintiffs.
To date, in the hundreds of consolidated RIAA cases assigned to her, Judge Gertner has rendered thousands of rulings based upon so-called evidence procured by MediaSentry, without ever asking for that same type of disclosure.

In fact, the RIAA and MediaSentry have steadfastly maintained that their methods are secret and "proprietary". While they are permitted to have whatever "proprietary" "secrets" they want, it is contrary to Federal law to maintain a federal litigation based upon such material.

Although it is routine in federal litigation to mandate such disclosure for any scientific or computer-based evidence, it is novel in RIAA litigation, since the courts have generally bent the rules for the RIAA, in view of the weak or nonexistent legal representation of defendants.

Let us hope that that era is coming to an end, and that the RIAA will have to prove its cases just like any other plaintiff in a federal litigation has to prove its case.

And let us hope that Judge Gertner will apply the same standards to the "evidence" submitted to her from MediaSentry, Doug Jacobson, and any other RIAA "expert".

-R.B.

Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

New contested case in Ohio, UMG Recordings v. English

We have learned of a new contested case in the Northern District of Ohio, UMG Recordings v. English.

The case was filed on March 11, 2009, 6 1/2 months after the date on which the RIAA told Congress it had stopped initiating new lawsuits.

The attorneys for the defendant are Camara & Sibley, the same Houston, Texas, based firm that has stepped in to represent Jammie Thomas, and Cohen Rosenthal & Kramer, based in Cleveland, Ohio.

Complaint
Answer


Commentary & discussion:

p2pnet.net





Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player